000 01579naa a2200229uu 4500
001 1110316272741
003 OSt
005 20190211180057.0
008 111103s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100 1 _aATKINSON, Rowland
_936018
245 1 0 _aGiving urban policy its 'medical' :
_bassessing the place of health in area-based regeneration
260 _aUK :
_bPolicy Press,
_cjan. 2006
520 3 _aHow does regeneration affect health and how have successive urban policy evaluations sought to measure such impacts? This article draws on a systematic review of national-level evaluation documentation relating to government-funded, area-based regeneration initiatives in the UK since 1980. The review examined whether health impacts had been intended and, if so, how they had been measured. The process and difficulties of conducting the review raise significant questions about policy formulation and evaluation. Is evidence-based policy possible where evaluations are not stored centrally? In short, a model policy development as 'enlightened' or incremental is hard to sustain where a lack of systematic storage of data means that researchers, policy makers and practitioners may struggle to produce clear answers to important policy questions
651 4 _aChina
_913345
700 1 _aTHOMSON, Hilary
_945832
700 1 _aKEARNS, Ade
_945833
700 1 _aPETTICREW, Mark
_945834
773 0 8 _tPolicy & Politics
_g34, 1, p. 05-26
_dUK : Policy Press, jan. 2006
_xISSN 03055736
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20111103
_b1627^b
_cGeisneer
998 _a20111103
_b1629^b
_cGeisneer
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c40872
_d40872
041 _aeng