000 | 01186naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1110318092441 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211180110.0 | ||
008 | 111103s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aBÜCHS, Milena _945842 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aThe Open Method of Coordination as a 'two-level game' |
260 |
_aUK : _bPolicy Press, _cjan. 2008 |
||
520 | 3 | _aOne of the most discussed issues surrounding the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) is the way in which it influences national social policies. This article argues that the question of influence is incorrectly posed. Instead, the OMC has to be understood as a 'two-level game' in which member state governments and non-governmental actors try to have an impact on the definition of the OMC objectives and, subsequently, strategically and selectively use the OMC in national policy-making processes. This, however, entails problems in terms of the transparency of policy-making processes and the accountability of national governments | |
651 | 4 |
_aChina _913345 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPolicy & Politics _g36, 1, p. 21-37 _dUK : Policy Press, jan. 2008 _xISSN 03055736 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20111103 _b1809^b _cGeisneer |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c40882 _d40882 |
||
041 | _aeng |