000 | 01392naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1110318114241 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211180111.0 | ||
008 | 111103s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aASQUITH, Andy _937391 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aA bullock, a monkey and Robocop : _ban assessment of the directly elected mayor in English local government |
260 |
_aUK : _bPolicy Press, _cjan. 2008 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis article examines the implementation of the directly elected mayor (mayor) in England. Following a short examination of the history of the mayoralty, the article addresses the impact of the 2000 Local Government Act. Introduced by a reforming Blair administration, the Act sought to radically transform the ways in which local government in England operated and introduced the concept of the mayor. As we shall see, the introduction of the mayor has not been without its problems. Despite these initial teething difficulties, it has nevertheless provided opportunities to demonstrate what can be achieved by this radical innovation. Finally, the article speculates about what the future might hold given the White Paper on local government leadership that was published in late 2006 | |
651 | 4 |
_aChina _913345 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPolicy & Politics _g36, 1, p. 39-53 _dUK : Policy Press, jan. 2008 _xISSN 03055736 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20111103 _b1811^b _cGeisneer |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c40883 _d40883 |
||
041 | _aeng |