000			01201naa a2200181uu 4500
001			1110318232141
003			OSt
005			20190211180119.0
008			111103s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aCHOI, Young Jun _938806
245	1	0	_aPension policy and politics in East Asia
260			_aUK : _bPolicy Press, _cjan. 2008
520	3		_aThis research aims to analyse recent pension reforms in South Korea and Taiwan, newly emerging welfare states in East Asia, using new institutional approaches and to test their explanatory power. This article introduces a theoretical review of new institutionalism and accordingly explains recent pension reforms in the two countries. In spite of their similar politico-institutional factors, the two countries have adopted highly different types of pension schemes and pension politics. I argue that new institutionalism has limitations in fully accounting for these differences and suggest a complementary explanation of business structures and influences
651		4	_aChina _913345
773	0	8	_tPolicy & Politics _g36, 1, p. 127-144 _dUK : Policy Press, jan. 2008 _xISSN 03055736 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20111103 _b1823^b _cGeisneer
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c40888 _d40888
041			_aeng