000			02003naa a2200289uu 4500
001			2040318465841
003			OSt
005			20190211180415.0
008			120403s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSERRITZLEW, Søren _934634
245	1	0	_aPortfolio allocation or policy horizons? determinants of coalition formation in danish local government
260			_aOxfordshire : _bTaylor & Francis, _cdec. 2010
520	3		_aIt is widely assumed that policy considerations are important when parties form government coalitions. But if this is so, and if coalitions are negotiated in multi-dimensional policy spaces with no majority parties, then a rapid turn-over of coalitions should be observed, cf. the chaos theorem. However, we rarely witness this. Here we analyse two of the most prominent theories that address this puzzle: Laver and Shepsle's portfolio allocation model; and Warwick's policy horizon hypothesis. We do not analyse the ‘usual suspects’ (i.e. national government formations in Europe), but present a new empirical testing ground: Danish local governments. We rely on Laver and Shepsle's Winset programme to identify ‘strong parties’ in the portfolio allocation model but develop a new measure of Warwick's policy horizons that better deals with problems of multi-dimensionality. In a conditional logit analysis of survey data from 3000 local councillors, we find support for the policy horizons model, but not for the portfolio allocation model
650		4	_aAdministração Regional _912242
650		4	_911941 _a Políticas Públicas
650		4	_aPlanejamento _912232
650		4	_aParceria _913415
650		4	_aCooperação _912134
650		4	_aModelo de Gestão _912032
650		4	_aDinamarca _913669
700	1		_aBLOM-HANSEN, Jens _923900
700	1		_aSKJAEVELAND, Asbjørn _946583
773	0	8	_tLocal Government Studies _g36, 6, p. 843-866 _dOxfordshire : Taylor & Francis, dec. 2010 _xISSN 03003930 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20120403 _b1846^b _cGeisneer
998			_a20120813 _b1641^b _cKeicielle
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c41963 _d41963
041			_aeng