000 | 01768naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 2040911394541 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211180435.0 | ||
008 | 120409s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aJIMENEZ, Benedict S _946607 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aIs government consolidation the answer? |
260 |
_aGeorgia : _bSAGE, _cdec. 2010 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe Great Recession that started in late 2007 is threatening to alter the local government landscape in the United States. With the steep decline in property and sales taxes, a number of state governments are now reviewing how their local government systems can be restructured to improve service delivery. Scholars from two campsthe advocacy of regional versus multiple centers of local governmenthave proposed contrasting visions of how the local public sector should be organized. The century-old debate between regionalists and localists has generated a considerable body of theoretical and empirical literature from which state governments can draw as they consider the most effective way of organizing their local governments. This essay discusses the different arguments for local government fragmentation versus consolidation, reviews the empirical evidence, and identifies future areas of research. It focuses on the impacts of the local public sector structure on service delivery, social class and racial segregation, and urban sprawl | |
700 | 1 |
_aHENDRICK, Rebecca _946608 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tState and Local Government Review _g42, 2, p. 258-270 _dGeorgia : SAGE, dec. 2010 _xISSN 0160323x _w |
856 | 4 | 2 |
_uObra disponível em meio impresso e eletrônico _yAcesso |
856 | 4 | 2 |
_uhttp://slg.sagepub.com/content/42/3/258.full.pdf+html _yAcesso |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20120409 _b1139^b _cGeisneer |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c41985 _d41985 |
||
041 | _aeng |