000			01981naa a2200325uu 4500
001			4022013242043
003			OSt
005			20190211181142.0
008			140220s2013 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aREICHERSDORFER, Johannes _949258
245	1	0	_aAccountability of immigration administration : _bcomparing crises in Norway, Denmark and Germany
260			_aLondon : _bSage Publications, _cJune 2013
520	3		_aAccountability can be conceptualized as institutionalized mechanisms obliging actors to explain their conduct to different forums, which can pose questions and impose sanctions. This article analyses different ‘crises’ in immigration policies in Norway, Denmark and Germany along a descriptive framework of five different accountability types: political, administrative, legal, professional and social accountability. The exchanges of information, debate and their consequences between an actor and a forum are crucial to understanding how political-administrative action is carried out in critical situations. First, accountability dynamics emphasize conventional norms and values regarding policy change and, second, formal political responsibility does not necessarily lead to political consequences such as minister resignations in cases of misbehaviour. Consequences strongly depend on how accountability dynamics take place
650		4	_aAccountability _913130
650		4	_aMigração _912895
650		4	_aEstudo de Caso _911993
650		4	_aAspecto Administrativo _914385
650		4	_aAspecto Político _912112
650		4	_aAspecto Social _912120
651		4	_aNoruega _913556
651		4	_aDinamarca _913669
651		4	_aAlemanha _913168
700	1		_92200 _a Christensen, Tom
700	1		_aVRANGBAEK, Karsten _934682
773	0	8	_tInternational Review of Administrative Sciences _g79, 2, p. 271-291 _dLondon : Sage Publications, June 2013 _xISSN 00208523 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20140220 _b1324^b _cNelson
998			_a20150413 _b1607^b _cDaiane
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c45734 _d45734
041			_aeng