000 | 01755naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 4102415074344 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190212145100.0 | ||
008 | 141024s2011 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aARCHER, Margaret S. _949694 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aHabitus, reflexividade e realismo |
260 |
_aRio de Janeiro : _bIESP / UERJ, _c2011 |
||
520 | 3 | _aMany scholars continue to ascribe a fundamental role to routine action in social theory and defend the continuing relevance of Bourdieus concept of habitus. Meanwhile, the majority recognize the importance of reflexivity. Inthis article, Archer examines three versions of efforts to render these concepts mutually compatible: empirical combination, hybridization, and theoretical and ontological reconciliation. In analytical terms, none of these versions is fully successful. The empirical argument is that the relevance of habitus began to decline in the late 20th century, in light of major structural changes in advanced capitalist democracies. In these circumstances, habitual forms have proven incapable of providing guidelines for peoples lives, thus making reflexivity necessary. The article concludes with the argument that even the reproduction of ones birth history now constitutes a reflexive activity, and that the most favorable mode of its production, which the author refers to as communicative reflexivity, is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain. | |
590 | _aISSN 00115258 Versão Impressa | ||
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tDados - Revista de Ciências Sociais _g54, 1, p. 157-206 _dRio de Janeiro : IESP / UERJ, 2011 _xISSN 16784538 _w |
856 | 4 | 2 |
_uhttp://www.scielo.br/pdf/dados/v54n1/05.pdf _yAcesso |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20141024 _b1507^b _cFabio |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c46190 _d46190 |
||
041 | _apor |