000 01755naa a2200193uu 4500
001 4102415074344
003 OSt
005 20190212145100.0
008 141024s2011 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d
100 1 _aARCHER, Margaret S.
_949694
245 1 0 _aHabitus, reflexividade e realismo
260 _aRio de Janeiro :
_bIESP / UERJ,
_c2011
520 3 _aMany scholars continue to ascribe a fundamental role to routine action in social theory and defend the continuing relevance of Bourdieu’s concept of habitus. Meanwhile, the majority recognize the importance of reflexivity. Inthis article, Archer examines three versions of efforts to render these concepts mutually compatible: “empirical combination”, “hybridization”, and “theoretical and ontological reconciliation”. In analytical terms, none of these versions is fully successful. The empirical argument is that the relevance of habitus began to decline in the late 20th century, in light of major structural changes in advanced capitalist democracies. In these circumstances, habitual forms have proven incapable of providing guidelines for people’s lives, thus making reflexivity necessary. The article concludes with the argument that even the reproduction of one’s birth history now constitutes a reflexive activity, and that the most favorable mode of its production, which the author refers to as “communicative reflexivity”, is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain.
590 _aISSN 00115258 Versão Impressa
773 0 8 _tDados - Revista de Ciências Sociais
_g54, 1, p. 157-206
_dRio de Janeiro : IESP / UERJ, 2011
_xISSN 16784538
_w
856 4 2 _uhttp://www.scielo.br/pdf/dados/v54n1/05.pdf
_yAcesso
942 _cS
998 _a20141024
_b1507^b
_cFabio
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c46190
_d46190
041 _apor