| 000 | 01925naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 5011915543244 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211181307.0 | ||
| 008 | 150119s2014 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aWALLE VAN DE, Steven _950732 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aSavings in public services after the crisis : _ba multilevel analysis of public preferences in the EU-27 |
| 260 |
_aLos Angeles : _bIIAS, _cSeptember 2014 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aPolicy responses to the global financial crisis can be divided into pro- and counter-cyclical approaches. The former advocates reducing public spending in times of financial constraints. The latter approach advocates public spending to boost the economy. Using public opinion (N = 23,652) data from 27 EU member countries, we empirically test a model for citizen preferences for reducing spending in public services versus government investment in measures to boost the economy as a response to the financial crisis. We look at individual- and country-level determinants of attitudes to savings in public services, and concentrate on four groups of explanations: political disaffection, ideology, self-interest, and macro-economic conditions. It was found that political disaffection and the respondents ideological orientation both have effects on preferences, as well as whether one experiences economic strain or receives welfare services. Macro-economic conditions, such as a countrys government deficit level, public debt or public expenditure have, surprisingly, no effect on citizens financial policy preferences. We discuss the implications of our results for public administration theory and practice. | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aJILKE, Sebastian _950733 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Review of Administrative Sciences _g80, 3, p. 597-618 _dLos Angeles : IIAS, September 2014 _xISSN 00208523 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20150119 _b1554^b _cFabio |
||
| 998 |
_a20150130 _b1559^b _cCarolina |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c47007 _d47007 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||