000			01809naa a2200229uu 4500
001			6062313225049
003			OSt
005			20190211181612.0
008			160623s2016 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aVEEBEL, Viljar _954452
242	1	0	_aTestando os modelos de transição na prática: os casos da Estônia e da Eslovênia
245	1	0	_aTesting the models of transition in practice : _bthe case-studies of Estonia and Slovenia
260			_aSão Paulo : _bEditora 34, _cabr./jun. 2016
520	3		_aThe following study is based on the comparison of the actual transition processes in Estonia and Slovenia in 1991-2000 with the aim of testing two conceptual models (shock therapy versus gradualism) of transition theory in practice. This article has two main goals, closely interlinked with each other. The first task is to analyse whether the reform paths undertaken by Estonia and Slovenia followed the theoretical concepts of 'shock therapy' and 'gradualism', the models the states are often symbolising in theoretical debates. The second task is to evaluate the ability of the theoretical models to correctly allocate the classical country examples to the shock therapy and gradualist models. This research study is also interested in what are the advantages and disadvantages of a polarised approach to transition theory models and how these models can be improved
590			_aISSN online: 18094538
700	1		_aNAM, Andra _954453
773	0	8	_tRevista de Economia Política = Brazilian Journal of Political Economy _g36, 2, p. 389-409 _dSão Paulo : Editora 34, abr./jun. 2016 _xISSN 01013157 _w
856	4	2	_uhttp://www.scielo.br/pdf/rep/v36n2/1809-4538-rep-36-02-00389.pdf _yAcesso
942			_cS
998			_a20160623 _b1322^b _cLarissa
998			_a20170811 _b1206^b _cLarissa
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c50844 _d50844
041			_aeng