| 000 | 01739naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 6071316193047 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211181615.0 | ||
| 008 | 160713s2015 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aKIM, Sunhyuk _954482 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAdministrative reform in South Korea : _bNew Public Management and the bureacracy |
| 260 |
_aLos Angeles : _bSage, _cDec. 2015 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThis article analyzes the political dynamics of South Koreas recent administrative reform. We argue that successive South Korean governments New Public Management-inspired reform programs have only achieved partial success. In particular, they have largely failed to attain their ultimate goal i.e. significant weakening of the traditionally strong elite bureaucracy in policymaking. The bureaucracy in the country has not become weakened as a result of the reform. Rather, the central government ministries have augmented their power and institutional autonomy. Those who were in charge of designing and implementing reform measures were bureaucrats themselves who were supposed to be the target of the reform. Such situation, in which the reformers were expected to reform themselves, has resulted in numerous incidences of sabotage, delay, obstruction, and distortion of the reform. This article concludes that it is crucial to consider the local contexts in which reform initiatives are adopted, interpreted, accepted, legitimated, and concretized for implementation | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aHAN, Chonghee _954483 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Review of Administrative Sciences _g81, 4, p. 694-712 _dLos Angeles : Sage, Dec. 2015 _xISSN 00208523 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20160713 _b1619^b _cAna |
||
| 998 |
_a20170811 _b1112^b _cLarissa |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c50863 _d50863 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||