000 | 01683naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6071317241347 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211181627.0 | ||
008 | 160713s2016 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aFLEDDERUS, Joost _954500 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aWhy people co-produce within activation services : _bthe necessity of motivation and trust - an investigation of selection biases in a municipal activation programme in the Netherlands |
260 |
_aLos Angeles : _bSage, _cMar. 2016 |
||
520 | 3 | _aActivation services that aim at re-employment of jobseekers often suffer from creaming, i.e. selecting those who have the best qualifications to re-enter the labour market. New ways of delivery, such as co-production, are supposed to be less subject to selection mechanisms. To analyse whether co-produced activation programmes suffer from selection biases, participants in a local innovative activation programme (n = 60) were compared to non-participants (n = 18). Participants are more motivated in general and showed higher levels of generalized, municipal and interpersonal trust. Moreover, high general motivation relates to high levels of trust and perceived control. This indicates that there is indeed a selection bias within co-produced activation programmes. Therefore, it remains uncertain whether co-production is more successful in dealing with creaming than common types of service delivery | |
700 | 1 |
_aHONINGH, Marlies _954501 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Review of Administrative Sciences _g82, 1, p. 69-87 _dLos Angeles : Sage, Mar. 2016 _xISSN 00208523 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20160713 _b1724^b _cAna |
||
998 |
_a20170811 _b1106^b _cLarissa |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c50874 _d50874 |
||
041 | _aeng |