000 | 01887naa a2200217uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6071317350947 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211181631.0 | ||
008 | 160713s2016 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aD. VENNIK, Femke _954509 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCo-production in healthcare : _brhetoric and practice |
260 |
_aLos Angeles : _bSage, _cMar. 2016 |
||
520 | 3 | _aCo-production in healthcare is receiving increasing attention; however, insight into the process of co-production is scarce. This article explores why hospitals involve patients and staff in co-production activities and hospitals experiences with co-production in practice. A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews (N = 27), observations (70 hours) and document analysis was conducted in five Dutch hospitals, which involved patients and staff in order to improve services. The results show that hospitals have different motives to involve patients and staff and have adapted existing methods to involve patients. Interestingly, areas of improvement proposed by patients were often already known. However, the process of co-production did contribute to quality improvement in other ways. The process of co-production stimulated hospitals thinking about how to realize quality improvements. Quality improvements were facilitated by this process as seeing patients and hearing their experiences created a sense of urgency among staff to act on the improvement issues raised. Moreover, the experiences served to legitimatize improvements to higher management bodies | |
700 | 1 |
_aVAN DE BOVENKAMP, Hester M. _954510 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aPUTTERS, Kim _917149 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aJ. GRIT, Kor _954511 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Review of Administrative Sciences _g82, 1, p. 150-168 _dLos Angeles : Sage, Mar. 2016 _xISSN 00208523 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20160713 _b1735^b _cAna |
||
998 |
_a20170811 _b1107^b _cLarissa |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c50878 _d50878 |
||
041 | _aeng |