| 000 | 01609naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 6071317525347 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190509090932.0 | ||
| 008 | 160713s2016 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_920525 _aLaffin, Martin |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPlanning in England : _bNew Public Management, Network Governance or Post-Democracy? |
| 260 |
_aLos Angeles : _bSage, _cJune 2016 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThree frameworks New Public Management, Network Governance and Post-Democracy are applied to identify and explain the direction of institutional travel in the field of land-use planning in England. These frameworks are used to assess the extent to which land-use planning has been centralized or decentralized over the last 20 years. The last Labour government (19972010) is contrasted with the Conservative-led Coalition government (20102015). Labour introduced planning policies and an underpinning regional administrative machinery that the latter has replaced with a localist planning system and sub-regional Local Enterprise Partnerships. The article concludes that both Labour and the Conservative-led Coalition embarked on policies that involved increased centralization, but that the centralization took different forms, though both parties denied sub-state institutions the political or other resources to challenge the central government in Westminster | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Review of Administrative Sciences _g82, 2, p. 354-372 _dLos Angeles : Sage, June 2016 _xISSN 00208523 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20160713 _b1752^b _cAna |
||
| 998 |
_a20170811 _b1108^b _cLarissa |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c50888 _d50888 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||