000			01919naa a2200193uu 4500
001			6071317561347
003			OSt
005			20190211181644.0
008			160713s2016 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMEIJER, Albert _954529
245	1	0	_aGoverning the smart city : _ba review of the literature on smart urban governance
260			_aLos Angeles : _bSage, _cJune 2016
520	3		_aAcademic attention to smart cities and their governance is growing rapidly, but the fragmentation in approaches makes for a confusing debate. This article brings some structure to the debate by analyzing a corpus of 51 publications and mapping their variation. The analysis shows that publications differ in their emphasis on (1) smart technology, smart people or smart collaboration as the defining features of smart cities, (2) a transformative or incremental perspective on changes in urban governance, (3) better outcomes or a more open process as the legitimacy claim for smart city governance. We argue for a comprehensive perspective: smart city governance is about crafting new forms of human collaboration through the use of ICTs to obtain better outcomes and more open governance processes. Research into smart city governance could benefit from previous studies into success and failure factors for e-government and build upon sophisticated theories of socio-technical change. This article highlights that smart city governance is not a technological issue: we should study smart city governance as a complex process of institutional change and acknowledge the political nature of appealing visions of socio-technical governance
700	1		_aRODRÍGUEZ BOLÍVAR, Manuel Pedro _946201
773	0	8	_tInternational Review of Administrative Sciences _g82, 2, p. 392-408 _dLos Angeles : Sage, June 2016 _xISSN 00208523 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20160713 _b1756^b _cAna
998			_a20170811 _b1108^b _cLarissa
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c50890 _d50890
041			_aeng