| 000 | 01699naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 7020310260849 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211181730.0 | ||
| 008 | 170203s2016 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aJAN BRANDSMA, Gijs _954949 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aAccountability in the post-Lisbon European Union |
| 260 |
_aLos Angeles : _bSage, _cdec. 2016 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThis special issue takes stock of recent post-Lisbon additions to the European Unions accountability toolkit. It provides indications that older decision-making tools tend to be more accountable than newer ones, and that, in some areas, decision-making is shifting towards less accountable arenas. This introductory article reviews the debate on the gradual evolution of the European Unions accountability system and introduces key aspects of the post-Lisbon era that can be expected to affect accountability in the European Union, and that have been overlooked by the literature thus far: delegated acts, economic governance and regulatory evaluations. The contributions to this special issue address each of these domains in detail and highlight the degree to which accountability has been enhanced. A final contribution shows how these arrangements fit into the wider landscape of already-existing European Union accountabilities and how this landscape has developed over time | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aHEIDBREDER, Eva _954950 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aMASTENBROEK, Ellen _943180 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Review of Administrative Sciences _g82, 4, p. 621-637 _dLos Angeles : Sage, dec. 2016 _xISSN 00208523 _w |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_uhttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0020852316663312 _yAcesso |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20170203 _b1026^b _cLarissa |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c51279 _d51279 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||