000 | 03139cam a2200337 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c52159 _d52159 |
||
001 | 19412834 | ||
003 | BR-BrENAP | ||
005 | 20190211181954.0 | ||
008 | 161207s2017 maua b 001 0 eng c | ||
020 |
_a9780674368309 _q(cloth : alk. paper) |
||
040 |
_aBR-BrENAP _bPt_BR |
||
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a128/.33 _223 |
090 |
_a3 _bM5553e |
||
100 | 1 |
_aMercier, Hugo, _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe enigma of reason / _cHugo Mercier, Dan Sperber. |
260 |
_aCambridg: _bHarvard University, _cc2017. |
||
300 |
_avi, 396 p. : _billustrations ; _c25 cm |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 |
_aIntroduction: A double enigma -- Part I. Shaking dogma: Reason on trial -- Psychologists' travails -- Part II. Understanding inference: From unconscious inferences to intuitions -- Modularity -- Cognitive opportunism -- Metarepresentations -- Part III. Rethinking reason: How we use reasons -- Could reason be a module? -- Reasoning: intuition and reflection -- Reason: what is it for? -- Part IV. What reason can and cannot do -- Why is reasoning biased? -- Quality control: how we evaluate arguments -- The dark side of reason -- A reason for everything -- The bright side of reasoning -- Part V. Reason in the wild: Is human reason universal? -- Reasoning about moral and political topics -- Solitary geniuses? -- Conclusion: In praise of reason after all. _tIntroduction: A double enigma _tPart I. Shaking dogma _t1. Reason on trial _t2. Psychologists' travails _tPart II. Understanding inference _t3. From unconscious inferences to intuitions _t4. Modularity _t5. Cognitive opportunism _t6. Metarepresentations _tPart III. Rethinking reason _t7. How we use reasons _t8. Could reason be a module? _t9. Reasoning: intuition and reflection _t10. Reason: what is it for? _tPart IV. What reason can and cannot do _t11. Why is reasoning biased? _t12. Quality control: how we evaluate arguments _t13. The dark side of reason _t14. A reason for everything _t15. The bright side of reasoning _tPart V. Reason in the wild _t16. Is human reason universal? _t17. Reasoning about moral and political topics _t18. Solitary geniuses? _tConclusion: In praise of reason after all. |
|
520 | _aReason, we are told, is what makes us human, the source of our knowledge and wisdom. If reason is so useful, why didn't it also evolve in other animals? If reason is that reliable, why do we produce so much thoroughly reasoned nonsense? In their groundbreaking account of the evolution and workings of reason, Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber set out to solve this double enigma. Reason, they argue with a compelling mix of real-life and experimental evidence, is not geared to solitary use, to arriving at better beliefs and decisions on our own. What reason does, rather, is help us justify our beliefs and actions to others, convince them through argumentation, and evaluate the justifications and arguments that others address to us. In other words, reason helps humans better exploit their uniquely rich social environment. This interactionist interpretation explains why reason may have evolved and how it fits with other cognitive mechanisms. It makes sense of strengths and weaknesses that have long puzzled philosophers and psychologists--why reason is biased in favor of what we already believe, why it may lead to terrible ideas and yet is indispensable to spreading good ones.-- | ||
650 | 0 |
_aRazão _955382 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aRazão _955382 _xAspecto Social |
|
650 | 0 |
_aAntropologia _912777 _xAspecto Psicológico |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSperber, Dan, _eauthor. |
|
909 |
_a2018/06 _bVinícius Pereira |
||
942 | _cG | ||
041 | _aeng |