| 000 | nam a22 7a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c524418 _d524531 |
||
| 003 | BR-BrENAP | ||
| 005 | 20230831151934.0 | ||
| 008 | 230829b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 por d | ||
| 020 | _a9781803926018 | ||
| 040 |
_aBR-BrENAP _bPt_BR |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 090 |
_a320.6 _bH23617 |
||
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aHandbook of research methods and applications in comparative policy analysis / _ceditado por B. Guy Peters e Guillaume Fontaine. -- |
| 260 |
_aCheltenham, UK ; _aMassachusetts, EUA : _bEdward Elgar Publishing, _c2020. |
||
| 300 |
_a410 p. : _bil. |
||
| 505 | 8 | 0 |
_t1 - Introduction to the Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis - B. Guy Peters and Guillaume Fontaine _t1. Introduction: substance and methods in comparative policy analysis _t2. Theoretical issues _t3. Methodological issues _t4. Research design and methods selection _t5. Conclusion: the importance of method for comparative policy research and practice _tPART I - THE METHODOLOGICAL DEBATE _t2 - The comparative method and comparative policy analysis - B. Guy Peters _t1. Introduction _t2. Modes of analysis in comparative policy studies _t3. Sampling on the dependent variable _t4. The comparative method and case studies _t5. The possibility of hybrid designs _t6. Several thoughts on small-N research _t7. Conclusion: what, if anything, is special about comparative policy studies? _t3 - The most-similar and most-different systems design in comparative policy analysis - Carsten Anckar _t1. Introduction _t2. The most-similar systems design _t3. The most-different systems design _t4. Deductive and inductive research strategies _t5. Applying the most-similar systems design in deductive and inductive research _t6. Applying the most-different systems design in deductive and inductive research _t7. The most-similar and most-different systems designs compared _t8. Criticism and response _t9. The relevance of the most-similar and most-different systems in contemporary research _t4 - Can a case study test a theory? Types and tokens in comparative policy analysis - Keith Dowding _t1. Introduction _t2. What is a theory? _t3. Testing a theory as an invariant generalization _t4. Testing a theory as an empirical generalization _t5. Testing a theory as a mechanism _t6. Unique cases _t7. Conclusions _tPART II - THEORETICAL CHALLENGES _t5 - Comparing policy processes: insights and lessons from the Advocacy Coalition Framework research program - Daniel Nohrstedt, Christopher M. Weible, Karin Ingold and Adam D. Henry _t1. Introduction _t2. Elements of comparison when applying the ACF _t3. Comparative ACF research: guidelines, experiences and shortcomings _t4. Insights and lessons _t5. Conclusion _t6 - Comparing agenda-settings: the Comparative Agendas Project - Laura Chaqués Bonafont, Christoffer Green-Pedersen and Henrik Bech Seeberg _t1. Introduction _t2. Agenda-setting models _t3. Methodological developments _t4. Political agendas _t5. Measures of the agenda _t6. Future direction of policy agenda research _t7 - Comparing historical cases: advances in comparative historical research - Grace Jaramillo _t1. Introduction _t2. Comparative historical analysis _t3. Maximizing process tracing results _t4. Indexes as tools of organizing and validating results _t5. Case study: assessing industrial policy using an index of intervention _t6. Conclusions _t8 - Comparing international policy transfers - Osmany Porto de Oliveira _t1. Introduction _t2. The comparative analysis of policy tranfers: a challenge, solution, and opportunity _t3. Beyond comparative country analysis: transnational comparison _t4. Issues, questions, and concepts for policy transfers comparative analysis _t5. What and how should we compare in international policy transfers analysis? _t6. Comparing transfer agents, instruments, and arenas _t7. Conclusion _tPART III - MEASUREMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS _t9 - Using experiments in comparative policy analysis: from policy evaluation to the policy process - Peter John _t1. Introduction _t2. What are experiments? _t3. Causal inference _t4. The history of experiments in public policy _t5. Elite experiments _t6. Conclusions: lessons for students of the policy process _t10 - Measuring change in comparative policy analysis: concepts and empirical approaches - Jale Tosun and Julia Schnepf _t1. Introduction _t2. Conceptualizing policy change _t3. The multi-dimensional approach to measuring policy change _t4. The budget approach to measuring policy change _t5. The diffusion approach to measuring policy change _t6. The outcome approach to measuring policy change _t7. Discussion and conclusion _t11 - Using indexes in comparative policy analysis: global comparisons - Tero Erkkilä _t1. Introduction _t2. Background _t3. Governance indicators and critique of raking _t4. Towards second-generation measurements: transparency metrics _t5. Measurement issues in regional and city-level indicators _t6. Summary _t7. Conclusions _t12 - Using text-as-data methods in comparative policy analysis - Fabrizio Gilardi and Bruno Wüest _t1. Introduction _t2. Text-as-data applications in comparative policy analysis: an overview _t3. Text-as-data in practice _t4. Methods _t5. New directions of text-as-data applications _t6. Conclusion _tPART IV - MIXED METHODS AND MULTI-METHODS _t13 - Critical multiplism for comparative policy analysis - William N. Dunn and B. Guy Peters _t1. Introduction _t2. Critical multiplism and mixed methods _t3. Some mixed-methods designs _t4. Bounding multiple triangulation _t5. Conclusion _t14 - Causal case studies for comparative policy analysis - Derek Beach _t1. Introduction _t2. Key terms _t3. Variance-based versus case-based approaches to studying public policies _t4. How to do case-based studies of policy processes _t5. Conclusions _t15 - Qualitative Comparative Analysis for comparative policy analysis - Eva Thomann _t1. Introduction _t2. QCA as a technique _t3. QCA in comparative public policy analysis _t4. Approaches to QCA in comparative public policy _t5. A case-oriented or condition-evaluating mode of reasoning _t7. Emphasizing substantively interpretable or redundancy-free models _t8. Conclusions _t16 - Process tracing for comparative policy analysis: a realist approach - Guillaume Fontaine _t1. Introduction: a popular method _t2. Methodology _t3. A template for realist process tracing _t4. Conclusion: process tracing for policy learning _tPART V - QUALITATIVE TECHNIQUES _t17 - Using focus groups in comparative policy analysis - Patrik Marier, Daniel Dickson and Anne-Sophie Dubé _t1. Introduction _t2. Why use focus groups in comparative public policy? _t3. The deployment of focus groups in Québec _t4. Methodological advantages _t5. Methodological disadvantages _t6. Designing focus groups _t7. Managing group dynamics _t8. Conclusion _t18 - Using ethnography in comparative policy analysis: premises, promises and perils - Raul Pacheco-Vega _t1. Introduction _t2. What is ethnography and how can it be applied in comparative policy analysis? _t3. Ethnography in public policy, public management, and public administration research _t4. Three modes of ethnographic engagement in comparative policy analysis _t5. Comparative policy analysis and policy studies from a comparative perspective: the two faces of Janus? _t6. Which policy issue areas use ethnography? _t7. Doing ethnography for comparative policy analysis: an applied approach _t8. Promises and perils of the application of ethnography as a research method for comparative policy analysis _t9. Conclusion: embracing ethnography in comparative policy analysis? _t19 - Using Q methodology in comparative policy analysis - Astrid Molenveld _t1. Introduction _t2. Philosophy _t3. How to execute and analyze a Q-methodology study _t4. Conclusion _t20 - Using the Narrative Policy Framework in comparative policy analysis - Aaron Smith-Walter and Michael D. Jones _t1. Introduction _t2. The narrative policy framework _t3. University of narrative _t4. Traveling with the NPF _t5. Limitations _t6. Conclusion _tPART VI - ISSUES FOR FURTHER RESEARCH _t21 - Trends in the development of comparative policy analysis - Iris Geva-May, David C. Hoffman and Joselyn Muhleisen _t1. Introduction _t2. Comparative policy analysis development as a distinct field of study _t3. The importance and limitations of comparative policy analysis and comparative policy analytic studies _t4. Trends in comparative policy analysis refereed articles: content analysis of EBSCO all academic database and the JCPA 1998-2016 _t5. The Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis _t6. Conclusions _t22 - Evolutionary theory in comparative policy analysis - Adrian Kay _t1. Introduction _t2. Evolutionary approaches _t3. Evolutionary frameworks for institutionalist theory in comparative policy analysis _t4. Evolutionary theory in comparative public policy: methodological issues _t5. Conclusion _tIndex |
| 650 | 0 |
_aEstudos de Política _968236 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aAnálise Comparativa de Políticas _968342 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_a Políticas Públicas _911941 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aMétodos e Técnicas _968343 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aPeters, B. Guy _4editor _98361 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aFontaine, Guillaume _4editor _955655 |
|
| 909 |
_a202308 _bRaynara |
||
| 942 | _cC | ||