000 04375nam a2200265uu 4500
999 _c6337
_d6337
001 6173
003 BR-BrENAP
005 20190713062527.0
008 020117s1998 xx ||||g| |0|| 0 eng d
020 _a0133097250
040 _aBR-BrENAP
_bPt_BR
090 _a11
999 _bPHL2MARC21 1.1
100 1 _aWEISS, Carol H
_911261
245 1 0 _aEvaluation :
_bmethods for studying programs and policies
250 _a2 ed
260 _aNew Jersey :
_bPrentice-Hall,
_c1998.
300 _aXII, 372 p.
504 _aInclui bibliografia
505 8 0 _tCHAPTER 1: Setting the scene
_tDomain of evaluation
_tDefinition of evaluation
_tWhat is evaluated? An excursus on terminology
_tOutcome and process evaluation
_tContributions of evaluation
_tHistory of evaluation
_tComparison between evaluation and other reserch
_tCHAPTER 2: purposes of evaluation
_tWho wants evaluation?
_tOvert and covert purposes
_tConditions unfavorable for evaluation
_tEvaluation for decision making
_tEvaluation as organizational learning
_tIntended uses for evaluation
_tFormative and summative evaluation
_tFormative-summative and process-outcome: different constructs
_tCompatibility of purposes
_tHow evaluations are commissioned
_tInside versus outside evaluation
_tLevel in the structure
_tWhose use shall be served?
_tCHAPTER 3: understanding the program
_tWhy program knowledge pays
_tCharacterizing the program
_tGetting to know the program
_tWhat is the program trying to achieve?
_tHow the program works: surfacing the preogram's theories of change
_tProgram theory and implementation theory
_tOrganizing the evaluation to investigate program theories
_tBuilding program theory
_tUsing theories of change as a guide to evaluation
_tComparing program theory to actual developments
_tAdvantages of explicating theories of change
_tCritiques of program theory
_tCHAPTER 4: Planning the evaluation
_tThe right time to evaluate
_tTypes of evaluation questions
_tAdditional decisions in the planning period
_tHow to decide which questions to pursue
_tSpecifying the questions
_tQuantitative or qualitative study
_tDesign of the evaluation
_tOne study or a fleet of studies?
_tDesigns for different types of programs
_tSome practical plans
_tEthical issues
_tCHAPTER 5: roles for the evaluator
_tTypes of participative roles
_tReasons for alternative evaluator roles
_tImplementing a participatory evaluation
_tBalance of pros and cons
_tAdditional limitations to participatory approaches
_tEthical issues
_tCHAPTER 6: developing measures
_tMeasurement
_tProgram outcomes
_tChoices among measures
_tUnanticipated consequences
_tInterim markers of progress
_tProgram processes
_tProgram inputs, resources, and environment
_tMultiple measures
_tHow many measures are enough?
_tMeasurement of variables
_tDeveloping new measures
_tDesirable characteristics of measures in evaluation
_tCHAPTER 7: collecting data
_tSources of data
_tSampling
_tInterviewing
_tCoding responses
_tExisting statistical data
_tEthical issues collecting data
_tCHAPTER 8: design of the evaluation
_tDesigning the process evaluation
_tDesigning the outcome evaluation
_tImportant concepts
_tDesigns
_tInformal designs
_tFormal designs
_tCHAPTER 9: the randomized experiment
_tRandom assignment
_tPlanned variations
_tProcedures for random assignment
_tCoping with difficulties that arise
_tConditions that make randomized experiments problematic
_tCriticisms of the randomized experiment
_tCHAPTER 10: extensions of good design
_tReplication
_tMeta-analysis
_tCost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis
_tCHAPTER 11: qualitative methods
_tDesign of qualitative evaluations
_tCollecting data
_tFieldwork and analysis
_tQualitative evaluation and program theory
_tEthical issues
_tCombining qualitative and quantitative approaches
_tCHAPTER 12: analyzing and interpreting the data
_tIntroduction
_tAnalytic tasks in evaluation
_tGeneral strategies of analysis
_tAn example of program theory as a guide to analysis
_tBooks on analytic methods
_tCHAPTER 13: writing the report and disseminating results
_tReporting
_tDissemination
_tUtilization of evaluation results
_tCHAPTER 14: evaluating with integrity
_tKnow the program
_tMaintain high technical quality and relevance
_tUse balance anf judgement
_tConsider use from the start
_tBehave ethically throughout the study
_tSurvive and reap rewards
650 4 _aPesquisa
_912011
650 4 _aAvaliacao de Pesquisa
_915884
650 4 _aCiencias Sociais
_912757
650 4 _aPesquisa Social
_911970
650 4 _912277
_a Avaliação
909 _a201807
_bVinícius
942 _cG
_2ddc
041 _aeng