000			01731naa a2200217uu 4500
001			6763
003			OSt
005			20190807062527.0
008			020910s2002 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLONG, David _96237
245	1	0	_aThe European Union and the Ottawa Process to ban landmines
260			_cJune 2002
520	3		_aThis paper address the reason why the Eu had such a great deal of trouble committing to the Ottawa Process to ban landmines. Though a number of Eu member states were key proponents of a comprehensive ban, the 1997 Joint Action, the EU restricted the transfer and production of anti-personnel mines but not their use or stockipiling, despite the fact that all but one of the member states were prepared of already had banned the weapons outright.The paper argues that and intergovernmental explanation of the agreement on the 1997 Joint Action requires in account of the Europeanizing influence of regular EU meetings, the role of the Council presidency, and the relative transparecy of intra-EU negotiations. The paper describes European involvement in the campaign to ban anti-personnel mines and the reasons w2hy landmines were and issue in the CFSP; explains the development of EU policy on the landmines ban up to and including the 1997 Joint Action; and concludes with the implications of this analysis for the EU's ability to act on complex foreign and security policy issues
650		4	_aÁrea de Livre Comércio _912994
650		4	_912286 _a Segurança Pública
650		4	_aPolítica Internacional _915759
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g9, 3, p. 429-446 _d, June 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020910 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20101028 _b1755^b _cKeicielle
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c6922 _d6922
041			_aeng