000 | 01732naa a2200229uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6810 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20231004062536.0 | ||
008 | 020911s2002 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHOLBROOK Jr., Robert L _94878 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aContact points and flash points : _bconceptualizing the use of justice mechanisms in the performance appraisal interview |
260 | _c2002 | ||
520 | 3 | _aThere has been a great deal of performance evaluation research, but little has been directed toward understanding subordinate responses to this process and developing ways to manage these responses. In constrast, the justice literature has identified mechanisms that directly influence recipient responses to organizational decisions. The present paper attempts to integrate justice theory and research into the performance appraisal interview. a conceptual model is presented that examines the relationship between three key justice mechanisms in the performance appraisal interview. Propositions are presented regarding the influence of these mechanisms using contact points (episodes where justice mechanisms are expected) and flash points (combinations of justice mechanism that might lead to problems). as a basis for understanding how justice works in this context. Research is recommended to test these propositions. Implications for conducting performance appraisal interviews are discussed | |
650 | 4 |
_912308 _a Poder Judiciário |
|
650 | 4 |
_aAvaliação de Desempenho _912937 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aReforma Judiciária _913808 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aEntrevista _913167 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tHuman Resource Management Review _g12, 1, p. 101-123 _d, 2002 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20020911 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
998 |
_a20101129 _b1746^b _cKeicielle |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c6969 _d6969 |
||
041 | _aeng |