000 | 01821naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6857 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154153.0 | ||
008 | 020912s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHILL, Larry B _94810 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe Ombudsman revisited : _bthirty years of Hawaiian experience |
260 |
_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cjan./feb.2002 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis article examines the classical, or real, ombudsman. Unlike quasi ombudsmen, which are bureaucratic control mechanisms subject to executive leaders or agency administrators, real Ombudsmen are operationally independent officials of the legislative branch. In 1969, the state of Hawaii was the first to create a real ombudsman. Although lowa, Nebraska, Alaska, and Arizona have since followed Havaii's lead, no intensive, long-term study of American ombudsmen has yet been published. This article examines the ombudsman as a monitor of Hawaii's bureaucracies and considers the extent to which the office has become institutionalized over the past 30 years. Nearly 75,000 citizens have had their complaints investigated by the ombudsman, and more than one-fifth of them were rectified, that is, the agency reversed its original action. This study indicates that the classical ombudsman can become institutionalized in the United States. The findings have policy implications as jurisdictions at the federal, state, and locial levels consider the creation of ombudsmen or quasi ombudsmen | |
590 | _aPublic administration review PAR | ||
590 | _aJanuary/February 2002 Volume 62 Number 1 | ||
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Administration Review: PAR _g62, 1, p. 24-41 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, jan./feb.2002 _xISSN 00333352 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20020912 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
998 |
_a20090616 _b1612^b _cmayze |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7015 _d7015 |
||
041 | _aeng |