000			01328naa a2200229uu 4500
001			6972
003			OSt
005			20190211154204.0
008			020917s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSMITH, Steven R _910129
245	1	0	_aFraternal learning and interdependency : _bcelebrating differences within reciprocal commitments
260			_c2002
520	3		_aThe value of reciprocity is often promoted through contemporacy policy making. In constrast, political philosophers, through developing critiques of the Rawlsian conception of justice as reciprocity, have often argued against such a principle forming a bsis for legitimating policies. This article also offers a critique of contemparacy policy making but using a recast form of the Rawlsian justification of reciprocity. The main argument is that the Rawlsian premise of 'sharing' fates is too weak (by itself) to underpin reciprocity. However, reciprocity might be more securely based on the premise of learning from each other's fates, given the diversity of individual experiences
650		4	_aReciprocity _912378
650		4	_aJustice _916520
650		4	_aRawls _916521
650		4	_aDiversity _916522
773	0	8	_tPolicy & Politics _g30, 1, p. 47-59 _d, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020917 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20080415 _b1436^b _cZailton
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7130 _d7130
041			_aeng