000			01512naa a2200181uu 4500
001			6992
003			OSt
005			20190211154205.0
008			020917s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSHAPIRO, Stuart _99845
245	1	0	_aSpeed bumps and roadblocks : _bprocedural controls and regulatory change
260			_c2002
520	3		_aThis study is an attempt to relate the effectiveness of the rule-making process to political controls on the bureaucracies that create regulations. such controls include requiring cost-benefit analysis, requiring review of regulations by a legislative committee, and requiiring interest group participation in rule writting efforts. Scholars have both credited controls with allowing politicians to control future bureaucratic decision making and blamed controls for ossifying the regulatory process. This article considers eight case studies of state regulation of child care. These case studies cast doubt on the assertions that political controls play a prominent role in bureaucratic decision making. The rule-making decisions of bureaucrats in these case studies were influenced far more by executives and legislators in power and interest groups than by the presence or absence of procedural controls put in place by previous political officeholders
773	0	8	_tJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory _g12, 1, p. 29-58 _d, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020917 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060508 _b1617^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7150 _d7150
041			_aeng