000			01336naa a2200205uu 4500
001			6993
003			OSt
005			20190211154205.0
008			020917s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aNIXON, David C _97757
245	1	0	_aWith friends like these : _brule-making comment submissions to the securities and exchange commission
260			_c2002
520	3		_aStructure and process theorists (McCubbing, Noll, and Weingast, among others), argue that the Administrative Procedures Act establishes a privileged position for the dominant organized interest of an industry in their dealings with regulatory agencies. We examined whether this was indeed the case with respect to the APA-required notice and comment period for rule making at the Securities and Exhange Commission (SEC). Based on an analysis of the commission's own statements regarding comment submissions in 1998, there is little to no evidence that interest that are more institutionally privileged are any more effective in changing the SEC's mind once the agency has proposed a rule
700	1		_aHOWARD, Robert M _916562
700	1		_aDeWITT, Jeff R _916563
773	0	8	_tJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory _g12, 1, p. 59-76 _d, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020917 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060508 _b1617^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7151 _d7151
041			_aeng