000			01796naa a2200205uu 4500
001			7008
003			OSt
005			20190211154207.0
008			020918s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMELKERS, Julia E _97034
245	1	0	_aBudgeter`s views of state performance-budgeting systems : _bdistinctions across branches
260			_bAmerican Society for Public Administration, _c2001
520	3		_aGiven that a majority of states have had some sort of performaance-budgeting initiative on the books for seveal years, how has implementation of such reform progressed? To answer this question, we surveyed legislative and executive budgeters from the 50 states, asking them for their impressions of performance-budgeting implementation in their state. Specifically, we asked these budget officers about the reasons for introducing performance budgetng in their state; the types of activities required of their system; responsible oversight bodies; extent of application across state agencies and depaarments ; and perceived levels of effectivness and problems experienced with implmentation of the budget reform. Our findings indicate that implementation of performance-based budgeting systems is proceeding slowly. While there are some benefits to highlight, result show that implementing peformance budgeting is not without problems - perhaps the greatest being difering perceptions of use and sucsses among budget players, particularly across branches of govenment
590			_aPublic administration review PAR
700	1		_aWILLOUGHBY, Katherine G _916567
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration Review: PAR _g61, 1, p. 54-64 _dAmerican Society for Public Administration, 2001 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020918 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20090610 _b1418^b _cmayze
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7165 _d7165
041			_aeng