000 | 01468naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7011 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20231023144316.0 | ||
008 | 020918s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_91250 _a Bohte, John |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aSchool bureaucracy and student performance at the local level |
260 |
_bAmerican Society for Public Administration, _c2001 |
||
520 | 3 | _aA major debate in American education centers on the role bureaucracy plays in shaping educational performance. Proponents of school choice argue that large educational bureaucracies have contributed to dramatic performance shorfalls in American`s public schools. Other scholars view educational bureaucracies as beneficial because they manage a wide range of problems and thus make it easier for teachers to focus on the core task of teaching. This study examines these competting claims about the impact of bureaucracy on student performance using district level data from Texas public schools. The finding from several regression models reveal negative relationships between bureaucracy (measured both at the central and campus administration levels) an student performance acroos several different grade levels | |
590 | _aPublic administration review PAR | ||
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Administration Review: PAR _g61, 1, p. 92-99 _dAmerican Society for Public Administration, 2001 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20020918 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20090610 _b1421^b _cmayze |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7168 _d7168 |
||
041 | _aeng |