000 | 01940naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7023 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154208.0 | ||
008 | 020918s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aLYNN, Laurence E., Jr _916574 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe myth of the bureaucratic paradigm : _bwhat tradicional public administration really stood for |
260 |
_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publisher, _cmar./apr.2001 |
||
520 | 3 | _aFor decade, public administration and management literature has featured a riveting story: the tranformation of the field`s orientation from an old paradigm to a new one. While many doubt claims concerning a new paradigm - a New Public Management - few question that there was an old one. An ingrained and narrowly focused pattern of thought, a "bureaucratic paradigm", is routinely attributed to public administration`s traditional literature. A careful reading of that literature reveals, however, that the bureaucratic paradigmis, at best, a caricature and, at worst, a demonstrable distortion of traditional thought that exhibited far more respect for law, politics, citizens, and values than the new, customer-oriented mangerialism and its variants. Public administration as a profession, having let lapse the moral and intellectual authority conferred by its own traditions, mounts an unduly weak challenge to the superficial thinking and easy answers of the many new pardgms of governance and public service. As a result, literature and discourse the capacity to effect public puposes and accoutability to the polity will be enhanced in a manner that comports with our Constitution and our republican institutions | |
590 | _aPublic administration review PAR | ||
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Administration Review: PAR _g61, 2, p. 144-160 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publisher, mar./apr.2001 _xISSN 00333352 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20020918 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20090616 _b1229^b _cmayze |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7180 _d7180 |
||
041 | _aeng |