000			01730naa a2200193uu 4500
001			7135
003			OSt
005			20190211154219.0
008			020923s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHURWITZ, Jon _95001
245	1	0	_aDemocratic principles, discrimination and political intelerance
260			_c2002
520	3		_aPolitical intolerance has typically been conceptualized as an unwillingness to extend expressive rights to disliked groups or individuals. One problem with this conceptualizations is that, when a given percentage of individuals in a polity is found to be intolerant, it is not known if these respondents are intolerant because of the actor because of the actor. We conceptualize intolerance multidimensionally, making a distinction between generic and discrimantory intolerance; while the former stems from an wnwillingness to permit the expressive act only when performed by a noxious group. wsing data from the Multi-Investigator II Study (a national telephone survey of adults in the United States), we employed a split ballot technique to decompose the total proportion of intolerant respondents into groups whose intolerance stems from an aversion to the actor (discriminatory) versus those intolerance stems from an aversion to the act (generic). We further explored the genesis of intolerance stems from an aversion to the act (generic). We further explored the genesis of intolerance, finding that the two types we identified stem from different antecedents
700	1		_aMONDAK, Jeffery J _916659
773	0	8	_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g32, 1, p. 93-118 _d, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020923 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060511 _b1523^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7291 _d7291
041			_aeng