000			01498naa a2200181uu 4500
001			7140
003			OSt
005			20190211154220.0
008			020923s2001 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aRUTGERS, Mark R _99314
245	1	0	_aSplitting the universe : _bon the relevance of dichotomies for the study of public administration
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cMarch 2001
520	3		_aTraditionally, the politcs/administration dechotomy is referred to in the study of public administration as the founding dichotomy. Debates on its tenability are as old as its dicovery . I the arguments put forward, however, no attiontion is paid to the epistemological nature of dichotomies. This article tries to fill this gap. It is usually assumed that dichotomies have a cotnraditoctory nature .By looking of the at the logic of contradictions, and arguments relating to use of logicl practice, it is concluded that this is a falce assumption. They are to be interpreted as conceptual constructs with an idelal-typical status. This reintermpretation of the nature of dichotimies helps to clarify the debates on the politics/admninstration dichotomy. It implies, for instatnce, that refeicting the dichotomy because of tis condradctory or unrealistic nature is misguided
773	0	8	_tAdministration & Society _g33, 1, p. 3-20 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, March 2001 _xISSN 00953997 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020923 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20100805 _b1600^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7296 _d7296
041			_aeng