000			01538naa a2200193uu 4500
001			7148
003			OSt
005			20190211154220.0
008			020923s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMUGHAN, Anthony _97544
245	1	0	_aEconomic performance, job insecurity and electoral choice
260			_c2002
520	3		_aThe existing literature on economic voting concentrates on egocentric and sociotropic evaluations of short-term economic performance. Scant attention is paid to other economic concerns people may have. In a neo-liberal economy characterized by global economic competition and a down-sized labour market, one widely-publicized economic concern - and one whose consequences political scientists have largely ignored - is job insecurity. Data from a survey conducted after the 1996 US presidential election show that job insecurity is a novel form of economic discontent that is distinctive in its origins and electoral impact from retrospective evaluations of short-term economic performance. In a multinomial probit model of electoral choice, performance measures offer little explanation of the Perot vote, but sociotropic job insecurity helps to explain why Americans rejected both major-party candidates, as well as abstention, in favour of the third-party alternative, Ross Perot
700	1		_aLACY, Dean _916668
773	0	8	_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g32, 3, p. 513-533 _d, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020923 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060511 _b1537^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7304 _d7304
041			_aeng