000 | 01613naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7159 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154223.0 | ||
008 | 020923s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHOLLEY, Lyn M _94887 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aGot SISP? Strategic Information Systems Planning in U.S. State Governments |
260 | _c2002 | ||
520 | 3 | _aData from the Government Performance Project Year 2000 survey of Information Technology in state governments were analysed to determine the status of strategic information systems and technology planning (SISP) in states. Qualitative and quantitative analysis indicate that information technology planning in most states may be more a middle-up than a top-down process. In most states, information technology planning is carried out a the agency rather than the state level, giving planning an operational (nonstrategic) rather than a policy focus. A possible explanation for this operational planning bias is the traditional structural separation in government between strategic policy decision making and technical and operational concerns. There is some support for this explanation in that states receiving top grades for information technology have overcome the separation by forming and empowering independent committees to link state govenment - wide decision making with information technology concerns | |
700 | 1 |
_aDUFNER, Donna _916676 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aREED, B. J _916677 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Performance & Management Review _g25, 4, p. 398-412 _d, 2002 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20020923 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
998 |
_a20060511 _b1544^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7315 _d7315 |
||
041 | _aeng |