000			01680naa a2200205uu 4500
001			7244
003			OSt
005			20190211154231.0
008			020925s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHURWITZ, Mark S _95002
245	1	0	_aDistributive and partisan issues in agriculture policy in the 104th house
260			_c2001
520	3		_aDistributive, informational, and partisan rationales provide contrasting accounts of legislative politcs. Which of these theorie best explains the decisions and policies of the Hose Agriculture Committee? We contend that all are appropriate, at various times, depending upon the particular issues and circumstances. By analysing issues within the jurisdirection of the Agriculture Commitee and the Agriculture and Rural Development Subcommittee of the Appropriations Committee in the 104th House, we demonstrate that the issue environements of both are multidemensional (even within individual bills) and that each committee has both distributive and partisan policy dimension. Therefore, it is impossible for either committee to be representative of the chamber on all its policy dimensions simultaneously. In addition, with regard to distributive issues salient to members, we find that both commitiees are homogeneous, high-demand outliers. Our study has important implications for distributive, informational, and partisan theories of legislative behavior and organization
700	1		_aMOILES, Roger J _916745
700	1		_aROHDE, David W _916746
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g95, 4, p. 911-22 _d, 2001 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020925 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060512 _b1633^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7398 _d7398
041			_aeng