000			01561naa a2200241uu 4500
001			7327
003			OSt
005			20190211154240.0
008			020926s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBROOME, Jon _91498
245	1	0	_aHow practitioners set share fractions intarget cost contracts
260			_bJ. R. Turner, _c2002
520	3		_aResearch into target cost contracts has been undertaken at The University of Birmingham to understand the choice of share profiles used in practice. The use of target cost contracts in increasing and the research has shown that share porfiles which vary with the extent of over or under run are more common today than constant share profiles. Seven examples of share profiles used in practice are described and the reason for their choice are explained. These choices are then dicussed in the context of key factors considered when choosing a contract strategy. The use of utility theory proposed by others for determining the share profile is briefly considered and the authors believe its is both insufficiently pragmatic and unable to deal with the complex interactions of the factors which should govern the choice of share profile
650		4	_aContract Strategy _916795
650		4	_aTarget Cost Contract _916796
650		4	_aIncentive Contract _916797
650		4	_aUtility Theory _916798
700	1		_aPERRY, John _916799
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Project Management _g20, 1, p. 59-66 _dJ. R. Turner, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020926 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20120416 _b1436^b _cGeisneer
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7480 _d7480
041			_aeng