000			01445naa a2200181uu 4500
001			7353
003			OSt
005			20190211154242.0
008			020927s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
245	1	0	_aToward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816-1992
260			_c2001
520	3		_aCoherent democracies and harshly authoritarian states have few civil wars, and intermediate regimes are the most conflict-prone. Domestic violence also seems to be associated with political change, whether toward greater democracy or greater autocracy. Is the greater violence of intermediate regimes equivalent to the finding that states in political transition exprerience more violence? If both level of democracy and political change are relevant, to what extent is civil violence related to each? base on an analysis of the period 1816-1992, we conclude that intermediate regimes are most prone to civil war, even when they have had time to stabilize from a regime change. In the long run, since intermediate regimes are less stable than autocracies, which in trun are less stable than democratic civil peace is not onluy more just than the autocratic peace but also more stable
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g95, 1, p. 33-48 _d, 2001 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020927 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060515 _b1501^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7506 _d7506
700			_a
041			_aeng