000			01254naa a2200181uu 4500
001			7384
003			OSt
005			20190211154245.0
008			020930s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_97957 _a Olsen, Johan P.
245	1	0	_aBarbage cans, new institutionalism, and the study of politics
260			_c2001
520	3		_aBendor, Moe, and Shotts want to rescue some of the ideas of the garbage can model and the new institutionalism. Their rescue program, however, is alien to the spirit of not only our work but also some recent developments that may promise a climate of dialogue between different approaches in political science. Bendor, Moe, and Shotts place themselves closer to a tradition fo unproductive tribal warfare than more recent attempts to explore the limits of and the alternatives to (mean-end) rational interpretations of political actors, institutions, and change. By building on a narrow concept of what is valuable political science, they cut themselves off from key issues that have occupied political scientist for centuries
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g95, 1, p. 191-198 _d, 2001 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020930 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060515 _b1530^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7537 _d7537
041			_aeng