000 | 01410naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7441 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154250.0 | ||
008 | 021001s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aGOREN, Paul _94246 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCore principle and policy reasoning in Mass publics : _ba test of two theories |
260 | _c2001 | ||
520 | 3 | _aPolitical scientists have debated whether citizens can use core principles in lieu of ideological orientations to deduce their policy preferences The "General Use" model of public opinion holds that everyone draws equally on core principles to determine their preferences. The "Expertise Interaction" model holds that the extent to which core principles influence policy preferences is a function of political expertise. Unfortunately, research design and measurement problems in extant work preclude a resolution of this debate. Here I acoount for these problems, test the predictions of both models, and find empirical support for each. The results demonstrate that while there is a moderate tendency for political expertise to strengthen the realtionship between core beliefs and policy preferences, virtually all citizens use core beliefs to deduce preferences | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tBritish Journal of political science _g31, 1, p. 159-177 _d, 2001 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20021001 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20060516 _b0911^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c7594 _d7594 |
||
041 | _aeng |