000			01630naa a2200205uu 4500
001			7992
003			OSt
005			20190211154349.0
008			021004s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aDONLEY, Michael B _93003
245	1	0	_aHomeland security : _bthe difference between a vision and a wish
260			_cSeptember 2002
520	3		_aThe U.S. government is considering how it should reorganize for homeland security. Consequently, attention has focused on the new Office of Homeland Security (OHS). Much debate focuses on two issues related to OHS: (1) whether the OHS should be a separate executive agency; and (2) whether the OHS director has sufficient authority to direct changes in policies and resource allocation of other departments and agencies. The authors believe the emphasis on these areas of interest is misplaced as measures of the eventual success of the OHS. Rather than focusing on these political issues, this article outlines several questions about how the OHS might approach its complex mission and highlight some organizational and bureaucratic realities that are likely to survive the debate over placement of the OHS within the executive branch and the authorities of the OHS director. This article conclude with a discussion of some organizational tools that the OHS or any coordingating office will require to fulfill its mandate
700	1		_aPOLLARD, Neal A _917050
770	0		_aSpecial lssue
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration Review _g62, p. 138-144 _d, September 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20021004 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060522 _b0953^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8140 _d8140
041			_aeng