000			02075naa a2200253uu 4500
001			8160
003			OSt
005			20190211154408.0
008			021108s2001 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aTRONDAL, Jarle _910797
245	1	0	_aIs there any social constructivist - istitutionalist divide? unpacking social mechanisms affecting representational roles among EU decision-makers
260			_cFebruary 2001
520	3		_aWhereas a constructivist turn has occurred in recent international relations theory, a institutionalist turn has ocurred in organization theories of the 1980`s and 1990`s. Social constructivism and organization theory exhibit important similarities as regards the basic underlying social mechanisms. Consequently, one rationale for comparing these two strands of argument rests on the observation that (i) some of the underlying social mechanisms are nearly identical, and (ii) they address the same dependent variables, i.e. identity formation and role enactment. The central question raised is how cognitive and integrative mechanisms may account for the role and identity percecptions evoked by government officials. Moreover, the frame of reference for the current discussion is national government officials participating on Commission expert committees and Council working parties. Building on survey and internview data, the current study shows that officials attending Commission expert committees tend to evoke expert roles more strongly than officials attending Council workin parties. Moreover, supranational allegiances are enacted strongly among officials devoting a great deal of time an energy towards participating on these committees
650		4	_aDecision Behavior _917099
650		4	_aEU Committees _917100
650		4	_aIdentities _917101
650		4	_aOrganization theory _917102
650		4	_aRole Perceptions _917103
650		4	_aSocial Constructivism _917104
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g8, 1, p. 1-23 _d, February 2001 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20021108 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20100623 _b1637^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8307 _d8307
041			_aeng