000 | 01484naa a2200241uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8165 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154409.0 | ||
008 | 021108s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHEALY, Judith _94686 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe care of older people : _bAustralia and the United Kingdom |
260 | _c2001 | ||
520 | 3 | _aAustralia and the United Kingdom have tried various ways to contain the growth and cost of institutional care for older people. The Australian government adopted central planning strategies from the mid 1980s that succeeded in limiting nursing home places and increasing community services. The United Kingdom government in the mid - 1990s required local governments to adopet quasi-market strategies but with less success in containing the growth and cost of institutional care. The two countries changed political direction later in the 1900s but both the Australian Liberal (conservative) government and UK "New Labor" want people to play more for their care in old age. Each country has something to learn from the policy experiences of the other, including the contentious issue of who should pay for aged care | |
650 | 4 |
_aSocial Care _917119 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aOlder People _916590 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aPolicy Strategies _917120 |
|
651 | 4 |
_aAustralia _913665 |
|
651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _916386 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tSocial Policy & Administration _g36, 1, p. 1-19 _d, 2001 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20021108 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
998 |
_a20060609 _b1636^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8312 _d8312 |
||
041 | _aeng |