| 000 | 01721naa a2200277uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 8354 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211154436.0 | ||
| 008 | 021117s2001 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aCARDINAL, Laura B _91813 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aKnowledge codifiability, resources, and science-based innovation |
| 260 |
_bRory L. Chase, _c2001 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aIndustry descipritions often depict science-driven industries as a single industry class, dominated by explicit knowledge in the form of patents, blueprints, diagrams, etc. This one-dimensinal view limits our ability to effectively manage the activities and routines across various stages of a science life cycle. The life cycle concept refers to the extent of development of the underlying scientific knowledge base. The knowledge in developed science fields (e.g. chemicals) is well codified, whereas in developing fields(e.g. biotechnology), it is less so. This variance creates interesting implications for innovation - product development routines will differ across developed and developing sciences. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the knowledge - and resource-based requirements of developed and developing science industries and the link to competitive advantage | |
| 650 | 4 |
_aIndustry _917587 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aKnowledge Management _917517 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aResources _917588 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aCoding and classifications Systems _917589 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aInnovation _916483 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aProduct Development _917429 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aALESSANDRI, Tood M _917590 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aTURNER, Scoot F _917591 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of Knowledge Management _g5, 2, p. 195-204 _dRory L. Chase, 2001 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20021117 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
| 998 |
_a20060612 _b1743^b _cQuiteria |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8500 _d8500 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||