000			01589naa a2200253uu 4500
001			8377
003			OSt
005			20190211154441.0
008			021118s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLEVITAS, Edward _96056
245	1	0	_aRethinking Rouse and Daellenbach's retingking : _bisolating vs. testing for sources of sustainable competitive advantage
260			_c2002
520	3		_aIn a recent paper, Rouse and Dalellenbach (1999) provide a five-step methodological approach which they feel will cure alleged inadequacies in empirical resource-based research. We suggest, however, that their methodology can provide only a useful aid for expanding our understanding of potential sustainable competitive advantages but will not allow researchers to effectively verify those hypothesized advantages. Specifically, we argue that Rouse and Daellenbach's methodology is plagued by three major shortcomings: (1) it confuses the important distinction between knowing-how and knowing-what; (2) it fails to recognize the importance of observable variables in verifying the sources of sustainable competitive advantage; and (3) it calls for sampling on the dependent variable
650		4	_aResource-based View _917311
650		4	_aSources of Competitive Advantage _917645
650		4	_aEmpirical Methodology _917646
650		4	_aLarge-sample Studies _917647
650		4	_aIntrusive Methods _917648
700	1		_aCHI, Tailan _917649
773	0	8	_tStrategic Management Journal _g23, 10, p. 957-962 _d, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20021118 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060612 _b1758^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8523 _d8523
041			_aeng