000 | 01452naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8405 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154445.0 | ||
008 | 021119s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSCHMIDT, Stephen _99655 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aIncentive effects of expanding federal mass transit formula grants |
260 | _c2001 | ||
520 | 3 | _aPublic subsidies to industries give firms incentives to alter their behavior. When calculating the effects of such programs, previous assessments of transit subsidies have not included the effects of these incentives on the firms` output. This article reports the responses of mass transit firms to the federal transit subsidy program and changes the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA 21) made to that program, as predicted by a structural model of output choice. TEA 21 increases bus service in medium-sized cities by 6-8 percent, but increases service in large cities by only 1-2 percent. The formula`s incentive tier is weak, and the size of the subsidy depends little on whether that ouput results in increased ridership. The formula could be redesigned to provide stronger incentives to lower cost and increase ridership, thus encouraging a more efficient response from transit firms | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of Policy Analysis and Management _g20, 2, p. 239-261 _d, 2001 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20021119 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20060614 _b1403^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8551 _d8551 |
||
041 | _aeng |