000 | 01542naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8410 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154446.0 | ||
008 | 021119s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aGREGORY, Robin _94339 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDecision aiding, not dispute resolution : _bcreating insights through structured environmental decisions |
260 | _c2001 | ||
520 | 3 | _aPublic participation in environmental decision has become commonplace. A favored model for public is to use the tools of dispute resolution to seek consensus among members of a multi-party stakeholder group. The authors believe that a focus on dispute resolution and consensus building can pose impediments to the creation of insights for decisionmakers and lead to the adoption of inferior policy choices. Instead, they advocate an alternative approach to stakeholder participation characterized as "decision aiding" through a structured process based on constructive, multi-attribute techniques and value-focused thinking. In this paper some of the major difficulties posed by a dispute-aiding process reviewed, and this alternative approach illustrated by describing a stakeholder consultation involving water-use planning for a hydroelectric facility on the Alouette River in British Columbia, Canada | |
700 | 1 |
_aTIM, McDaniels _917695 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aDaryl Fields _917696 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of Policy Analysis and Management _g20, 3, p. 415-432 _d, 2001 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20021119 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20060614 _b1556^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8556 _d8556 |
||
041 | _aeng |