000			01948naa a2200181uu 4500
001			8470
003			OSt
005			20190211154455.0
008			021120s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aCOGGBURN, Jerrel D _92320
245	1	0	_aPersonnel deregulation : _bexploring differences in the American States
260			_c2001
520	3		_aPersonnel deregulation has occupied a central place on the American reform agenda for several years. For example, formal calls for personnel deregulation can be traced to the National Academy of Public Administration (1983), the Volcker Commission (1989), the Winter Commission (1993), Reiventing Government (Osborne and Gaebler 1992), and most recently to the National Performance Review National Partnership of Reinventing Government (1993). Deregulation represents an important topic for inquiry because, in part, it entails a dramatic reorientation in the locus of personnel responsibility (form centralized control to decentralized discretion) and in the accountability relationships that govern the personnel function (from bureaucratic, hierarchical control to reliance on professional accountability of managers). Still, knowledge is limited about the levels of personnel deregulation present in various jurisdiction and about the factors that are related to them. This article presents a measure of state government personnel deregulation. The measure demonstrates wide variation in the extent of such deregulation. The article then tests a number of hypotheses regarding relationships thought to affect personnel deregulation levels. Fidings suggest the importance of public employee unionism, political party control, and administrative professionalism to the states` personnel deregulation levels
773	0	8	_tJournal of Public Administration _g11, 2, p. 223-244 _d, 2001 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20021120 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060619 _b1141^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8615 _d8615
041			_aeng