000 | 01500naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8514 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154503.0 | ||
008 | 021121s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aCHAKERINA, Richard _92087 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aComprehensive administrative reform implementation : _bmoving beyond single issue implementation research |
260 | _c2001 | ||
520 | 3 | _aMuch can be learned about administrative change and implementation if the interactions - more specifically the synergy, tradeoff, or avoidance among reform proposals - are examined. If seen in their institutional context, these interactions are an important element in reform implementation success or failure. The Florida experience with comprehensive reform has provided a unique opportunity to explore this issue. We found that interactions are important for implementation success because of the consequences of interactions for claims on limited implementation resources. This case suggests that all elements of the implementation model , including policy interactions, are dynamic. Time allows synergistic learning, and reduction of ambiguity and conflict. The failure or success of other reform initiates informs the process and defines both costs and the likehood of implementations success | |
700 | 1 |
_aMAVIMA, Paul _917839 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of public administration _g11, 3, p. 353-377 _d, 2001 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20021121 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20060619 _b1742^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8659 _d8659 |
||
041 | _aeng |