000 | 01493naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8525 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154504.0 | ||
008 | 021121s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aWEISSERT, Carol _911267 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aReluctant partners : _b |
260 | _c2001 | ||
520 | 3 | _aAs devolution of responsabilities from higher-level governemts to lower-level governments and nonprofits continues, more and more attention will be focused on implementation, specifically on how to convince reluctant partners to participate fully in program success. in spite of a considerable body of research on implementation, few systematic efforts have been made to examine the predicators of succesful compliance. This article provides such an effort, examining five possible predictors to implementation of primary care mandates in seven states. Among key factors in succesfull implementation of these mandates were legislative funding targeted to the program and procative leadership within the medical schoolls. Monitoring and oversith were in place in only one state where implementation was judged to have been mosts sucessesfull. The wording of legilative mandate and communication - often touted as important elements of successful implementation - were not imporatnte in these seven states | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of public administration _g11, 4, p. 435-453 _d, 2001 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20021121 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20060620 _b1620^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8670 _d8670 |
||
041 | _aeng |