000			01731naa a2200193uu 4500
001			8626
003			OSt
005			20190211154517.0
008			021125s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLEWIS-BACK, Michael S _96085
245	1	0	_aParty, ideology, institutions and the 1995 French president election
260			_c2002
520	3		_aIn French election studies, a central debate concerns the French voter's standing decisions' - is it party or ideology? The debate has been ongoing because of data and masurement issues and we add, because of an inadequate understanding of the role electoral institutions play. The 1995 French National Election Study allows a fresh attack on these questions. It contains promising party and ideology measures, on a very large national sample. Both party identification and left-right ideological identification are shown to be widely held, with the latter more so. Their relative structural effects are found to depend heavily on the dynamics of the dual ballot. Party is more important for electoral choice on the first ballot, while ideology is more important on the second. This finding, demonstrated in fully specified logistic regression models of the presidential vote, seems also to inhere in the logic of French electoral institutions. The two-ballot rules, coupled with the pervasiveness of ideological and party identification is the public mind, go far towards revealing and explaining and underlying stability of the French political system
700	1		_aCHLARSON, Kevin _916665
773	0	8	_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g32, 3, p. 489-512 _d, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20021125 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060623 _b1139^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8771 _d8771
041			_aeng