000			01541naa a2200193uu 4500
001			8628
003			OSt
005			20190211154517.0
008			021125s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMUGHAN, Anthony _97544
245	1	0	_aEconomic performance, job insecurity and electoral choice
260			_c2002
520	3		_aThe existing literature on economic voting concentrates on egocentric and sociotropic evaluations of short-term economic performance. Scant attentionis paid to other economic concerns people may have. In a neo-liberal economy characterized by global economic competition and a down-sized labour market, one widely publicized economic concern - and one whose consequences political scientists have largely ignoored - is job insecurity. Data from a survey conducted after the 1996 US presidential election show that job insecurity is an novel form of economic discontent that is distinctive in its origins and electoral impact from retrospective evaluations of short-term economic performance. In a multinomial probit model of electoral choice, performance measures offer little explanation of the Perot vote, but sociotropic job insecurity helps to explain why Americans rejected both major-party candidates, as well as abstention, in favour of the thjird-party alternative, Ross Perot
700	1		_aLARCY, Dean _917961
773	0	8	_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g32, 3, p. 513-533 _d, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20021125 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060623 _b1433^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8773 _d8773
041			_aeng