000 | 01444naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8646 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154520.0 | ||
008 | 021126s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aTREISMAN, Daniel _910778 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aPolitical business cycles and Russian elections, or the manipulations of "Chudar" |
260 | _c2001 | ||
520 | 3 | _aPolitical business cycle theories tend to focus on one policy instrument or macroeconomic lever at a time. Efforts to find empirical evidence of oportunistic business cycles have turned up rather meagre results. We suggest that these facts may be related. If ways of manipulating the economy to win votes are thought of as substitues, with changing relative costs, one would expect rational policy makers to switch between them in different periods as costs change. We illustrate this argument with a discussion of Russia. In Russia, four nationwide votes have been held sice 1993. We deduce the set of policies that a rational, behind-the-scenes strategist - the "Chudar" of the title - would recommend to an incumbent who believes the voters to vote retrospecttively. We show that the expectations are borne out closely in the actual macroeconomic data | |
700 | 1 |
_aGIMPELSON, Vladimir _917970 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g31, 2, p. 225-246 _d, 2001 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20021126 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20060626 _b1437^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8791 _d8791 |
||
041 | _aeng |